Are you trying to solve any of these challenges?

  • Manage structured data for campaigns, content, product catalogs or other marketing data
  • Enrich your digital platforms (e.g. analytics, CMS) for better personalization and insights
  • Improve tracking code/Adobe CID classifications globally
  • Build an improved and standardized process in your digital advertising/media operations
  • Unify disparate internal and external teams/agencies around creating clean and uniform data
  • Trying to get a taxonomy implementation buy-in, including standardizing naming conventions across content and campaigns
  • Going through a digital transformation and not sure where to begin

If any of these issues are important to you, Claravine can help. Schedule a demo today.

Learn how the best brands master campaign tracking

Marketing success begins with good data. This guide shares the steps any organization can take to implement campaign tracking best practices and optimize spend based on richer insights.

This guide will cover important topics including:

  • How to align campaign measurement with strategic marketing objectives
  • How to enforce a consistent classification taxonomy across teams and channels
  • How to optimize digital marketing based on reported performance metrics

Get Started

Learn how we can help you instantly standardize your tracking and improve your data quality in ways that drive better decisions.

A look under the hood, Pt. 1: Code Composition

Task 1: Generate a Unique Tracking Code for New Campaign Initiatives
This part looks easy on the surface, but it carries some hidden complexities. Generating a random string for every new initiative is surely no challenge for a computer, and robust tracking systems such as Adobe Analytics would have no difficulty marshalling all of those random codes on the reporting side. But very rarely will you see companies using that method. Companies generally come up with their own custom recipe for assembling tracking codes, which emerge as a daisy-chained string of descriptors, like these:
sea:search:default:na na
 As you can see, tracking code syntax is a free-for-all. Some organizations settle on simple patterns with only a few moving parts, while others extend their codes to include everything and the kitchen sink. There are no rules enforced anywhere, not for application of uppercase vs. lowercase letters, not for the delimiters you use to divvy up your codes, and not for the meta data components you’ll push into each tracking code. The only rules that matter are the ones each organization establishes on its own terms.
 Other tracking code generators (i.e., our competitors) seem intimidated by this unstructured universe, and will typically try to push their own syntactical recipe upon their clients. That’s not how we operate. We not only allow you to follow your own patterns, we want you to. Sincerely. Why? Because we developed a program that reverse-engineers your favorite patterns, and derives the significance of each component part. Understanding what sorts of codes you’ve created in the past enables us to predict what tomorrow’s codes should look like. And it also lets us automate the next task.
Request a conversation with a Claravine rep.
[Editor’s note: This is part one of an in-depth look at the four essential tasks teams must implement consistently for accurate campaign tracking. Click here for Part 2, Code Classification, here for Part 3, Link Assemblyhere for Part 4, Data Capture]